I wondered about the please, for I’m making a firm statement.
I’d like people to consider the second hand industry, and particuarly the re-selling of creative items. Currently, the creators receive nothing for re-sold goods – not even a sale figure, and that has an effect.
If a single copy of my book is read by a million people, my sales will show as one, and my profit will be my cut (after printing, carriage and any publishing costs) from that single copy. It won’t even show on Nielsen book data that a million people have read it. So if I approach a retailer or wholesaler to take on that title, they’re going to consider my book as low selling and won’t take the risk; the same is true if I approach an agent or marketeer or a venue to give a reading at. They look at figures, and there won’t be any, so again, I will not profit although all those people have from my work without giving me any recompense.
Even if the word of mouth of those million generated much buzz, I receive only pounds, or pence, for something enjoyed by the population of a large city.
Although that example may be extreme, I hope that the principle is clear. If your book is resold 5 times per copy, that’s quite a loss for the author and publisher – worse if you are both.
It is also worth considering this for music and video particularly.
If you translated it to theatre, it’s like 4 out of 5 people seeing your play without paying – and most of them not even filling up the auditorium so that you feel that you’ve a full and appreciative audience.
Independent publishing, along with any kind of creativity, is hard work that often isn’t renumerated as it should be, and finding your audience can take time. This is worsened when people pass on books, DVDs, music albums ‘for the benefit of the community’ or even worse, pretending that they’re being environmental, anticapitalist or even Christian.
It is angering when that item garners another cause – such as the church of England – money when you the creator have received none from it, and that they did nothing to procure or promote it. Someone brought it to them, they put it on a shelf, and let people find it, and yet it’s they who receive an income.
Did you know that the charity Oxfam destroys unsold books quite quickly? You may wish to reconsider donating to what is quite a hard headed business with charitable status, cutting its costs not only through unpaid workers but selling unpaid materials in its ubiquitous shops.
I also resent those who sell on works to a third party seller, thus creating a profit for themselves, and then one for the reseller.
I recently found an example where the 2nd copy of my first novel was in a large specialist second hand seller’s stock, on ebay – so it was discoverable by people anywhere in the world, and of course, me. Given the issues of the last post, it was galling that people were bidding on a book that is in print, and offering twice what it was sold for – and none of that coming to me.
Yo’d think that a personally signed such early copy to someone I knew might be a little more precious…. or you could wait and see if I became famous. The reseller showed the title page which states that the books cannot be resold without the author and publisher (ie my) written permission. I didn’t give it.
It also showed exactly who I’d sold it to.
I really think that re-selling needs an overhaul, because so much is lost by creators who often don’t receive much in the name of other people’s gain.
Video piracy is highly policed and yet other forms of money making from media without giving the originator a royalty are not.
Even famous authors and artists may not receive much and are probably not as rich as you think, so please do’t assume that they can afford it. Those of us still searching for a wider audience certainly can’t.
I don’t want to sound aggressive or offputting but I must state that I will be robust if I discover instances of this.
I ask people to think about allowing others (or yourself, if you’re a second hand seller) to reap what you didn’t sow, and let to sower and tender go without…especially for small, new and independent creators.
In fact, you’re not even reaping – you’re taking someone else’s cut, threshed corn and putting it on your market stall.
Why should your business run at the expense of others?